· 10/19/2009
Coppage v. Bradshaw
Citations
- 665 F. Supp. 2d 1361
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96787
- 2009 WL 3366124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the “evidence creates a genuine issue of fact as to whether Bradshaw willfully violated the FLSA and precludes summary judgment for Bradshaw on statute of limitations grounds”
- “[Wjhere an exempt employee receives additional compensation above his guaranteed minimum salary, an employer may make deductions without destroying the salary basis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thrash
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.