Skip to main content
· 10/19/2009

Coppage v. Bradshaw

Citations

  • 665 F. Supp. 2d 1361
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96787
  • 2009 WL 3366124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “evidence creates a genuine issue of fact as to whether Bradshaw willfully violated the FLSA and precludes summary judgment for Bradshaw on statute of limitations grounds”
  • “[Wjhere an exempt employee receives additional compensation above his guaranteed minimum salary, an employer may make deductions without destroying the salary basis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thrash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.