· 4/15/2010
Copp v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 692 S.E.2d 220
- 279 Va. 675
- 2010 Va. LEXIS 43
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an exception to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
- holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an exception to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
- holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an excep- tion to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
- “Language in a policy purporting to exclude certain events from coverage will be construed most strongly against the insurer.”
- noting standard for insurance policy interpretation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koontz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.