Skip to main content
· 4/15/2010

Copp v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 692 S.E.2d 220
  • 279 Va. 675
  • 2010 Va. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an exception to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
  • holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an exception to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
  • holding that insurer had a duty to defend insured for a claim excluded by a homeowner’s policy but covered by an excep- tion to the exclusion in an umbrella policy
  • “Language in a policy purporting to exclude certain events from coverage will be construed most strongly against the insurer.”
  • noting standard for insurance policy interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koontz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.