Skip to main content
· 8/26/1999

Copland v. Grumet

Citations

  • 88 F. Supp. 2d 326
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15678
  • 1999 WL 1567794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • auditor’s role in formulating, preparing and/or compiling false financial data issued by client not a basis for liability
  • “[T]o satisfy the ‘contemporaneous’ requirement,” plaintiff must have “bought stock on the same dates on which the defendant’s sales took place.”
  • “After considering the issue of the appropriate interpretation of the contemporaneous requirement in this context, we find persuasive the reasoning applied in the cases cited by defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.