· 8/26/1999
Copland v. Grumet
Citations
- 88 F. Supp. 2d 326
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15678
- 1999 WL 1567794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- auditor’s role in formulating, preparing and/or compiling false financial data issued by client not a basis for liability
- “[T]o satisfy the ‘contemporaneous’ requirement,” plaintiff must have “bought stock on the same dates on which the defendant’s sales took place.”
- “After considering the issue of the appropriate interpretation of the contemporaneous requirement in this context, we find persuasive the reasoning applied in the cases cited by defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.