Copland v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing burglary conviction because the State failed to show that defendant’s fingerprint on a store tag on a tool at the burglarized premises was impressed during the burglary, and not before the burglary
• reversing a conviction when the State solely relied on the defendant’s fingerprint on a tool in the 9 58338-1-II burglarized property because the tool was recently accessible to the public in the stream of commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).