Skip to main content
· 6/1/2007

Copestakes v. Reichard-Copestakes

Citations

  • 925 A.2d 874
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 155
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[p]ursuant to the ‘prisoner mailbox rule,’ a document is deemed filed when placed in the hands of prison authorities for mailing.” (citation omitted)
  • applying prisoner mailbox rule to filing of Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Musmanno, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.