Copesky v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e are convinced Commercial Cotton’s characterization of a bank-depositor 5 relationship as quasi-fiduciary is now inappropriate. . . . It is thus our conclusion that banks . . . 6 are not fiduciaries for their depositors.”
• the bank is \in no sense a true fiduciary\ to its customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).