Third Circuit· 3/27/1919
Copertino v. United States
Citations
- 256 F. 519
- 167 C.C.A. 585
- 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- surveillance of stolen copper bars from a distance did not constitute actual or constructive possession of the bars by the owner or his agent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haight, Jtidge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Raymond Walter MonasterskiSixth Circuit· 1977-12-13· cited 43×
- United States v. Daniel R. Henneberry and William A. YoungermanEighth Circuit· 1983-10-27· cited 35×
- United States v. CohenThird Circuit· 1921-07-15· cited 35×
- United States v. DoveFourth Circuit· 1980-08-12· cited 31×
- Ex Parte WallsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1997-11-14· cited 25×
- United States v. Richard J. CawleyThird Circuit· 1958-05-23· cited 24×
- United States v. John MuziiSecond Circuit· 1982-04-19· cited 16×
- United States v. Robert S. Egger, United States of America v. Joseph LaceyNinth Circuit· 1972-11-28· cited 15×
- State v. MinnickSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-04-07· cited 10×
- Felker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-04-09· cited 8×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1980-08-12
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.