Skip to main content
· 5/18/1891

Copeland v. Stoneham Tannery Co.

Citations

  • 142 Pa. 446
  • 21 A. 825
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 757

Syllabus

<p>In a suit brought against a corporation to recover a stipulated compensation for procuring a purchaser of the real estate of the defendant, in the absence of evidence that the employment of the plaintiff was previously authorized, or that it was subsequently ratified by the corporation, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover.*</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.