Skip to main content

Copeland v. State

Citations

  • 343 Ark. 327
  • 37 S.W.3d 567
  • 2001 Ark. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where an appellant during proffer failed to offer the substance of a witness’s testimony on which he would rely, the matter was not preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glaze, Hannah, Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.