Skip to main content
· 7/30/2010

Copeland v. Locke

Citations

  • 613 F.3d 875
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15762
  • 2010 WL 2977399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that cuts, abrasions, and an injury to the knee support a finding of excessive force
  • holding that under Missouri state law, “the mayor and the board of aldermen” of a fourth-class city in Missouri “are the final policy makers” for their state law assigned duties
  • finding genuine dispute about whether injuries resulted because of peculiarities of plaintiff or from use of force
  • slamming 67-year old man against a parked vehicle, throwing him to the ground, handcuffing him, and kneeing him in the back is not de minimis force
  • denying qualified immunity because “[n]o reasonable police officer could believe that he had arguable probable cause” to arrest an individual for verbally challenging an officer during a traffic stop
  • denying summary judgment on excessive-force claim where officer slammed a sixty-seven-year-old man against a parked vehicle, threw him to the ground, handcuffed him, kneed him in the back, and clamped down on the handcuffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Beam, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.