Copeland v. Harness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that any error was rendered harmless because the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the indictment counts that would have been affected by the error
• error rendered harmless where jury was unable to reach a verdict on the counts of the indictment that would have been affected by the error
• error rendered harmless where' jury was unable to reach a verdict on the counts of the indictment that would have been affected by the error
• when the appellate record does not contain the visual aid presented at trial and the transcript does not fully disclose what transpired at trial, this Court’s review is hampered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).