Copeland v. Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “where . . . the judgment of divorce provided that no alimony shall be paid, the decree cannot be modified to require one party to contribute toward the maintenance of the other”
• “Child support payments are not considered the property of the custodial parent and are solely for the benefit of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Staple v. Staple
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-06· cited 65×
• Rickner v. Frederick
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-03-19· cited 19×
• Krist v. Krist
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-07-31· cited 16×
• Cochran v. Buffone
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-10-01· cited 14×
• Torakis v. Torakis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-05-05· cited 13×
• Kalter v. Kalter
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-10-06· cited 11×
• Haefner v. Bayman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-04· cited 8×
• Madden v. Madden
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-04-19· cited 6×
• Orlowsky v. Orlowsky
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slater v. Slater
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1950-05-18· cited 14×
• Verbeke v. Verbeke
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1958-06-12· cited 12×
• Ferrera v. Ferrera
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-03-27· cited 8×
• Ballentine v. Ballentine
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1959-07-13· cited 7×
• Gallagher v. Department of Social Services
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-06-24· cited 4×