Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2/22/2000
Copeland v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 525 S.E.2d 9
- 31 Va. App. 512
- 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of defendant’s exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman’s backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
- holding that evidence of defendant's exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman's backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
- holding that evidence of defendant’s exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman’s backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
- holding that evidence of defendant's exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman's backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
- holding that defendant’s actions had the dominant purpose of an appeal to the prurient interest in sex where “[e]vidence [showed] that Copeland exposed his genitals, that he was visibly aroused, and that he was masturbating”
- “To be obscene, conduct must violate contemporary community standards of sexual candor.” (citing House v. Commonwealth, 169 S.E.2d 572, 576 (Va. 1969))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Willis, Annunziata
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moses v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-04-12· cited 22×
- Allman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-05-25· cited 13×
- Lofgren v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-11-03· cited 6×
- Moses v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-08-10· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. ScottVirginia Circuit Court· 2002-10-23
- MAYORGA IPINABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2025-06-26
- James David Hazelwood v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2026-06-09
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-07-21· cited 959×
- Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1990-09-21· cited 238×
- Freeman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-03-12· cited 50×
- Hart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-22· cited 33×
- House v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1969-09-05· cited 21×
- Dyke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1941-11-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.