Skip to main content

Copeland v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 525 S.E.2d 9
  • 31 Va. App. 512
  • 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of defendant’s exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman’s backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
  • holding that evidence of defendant's exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman's backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
  • holding that evidence of defendant’s exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman’s backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
  • holding that evidence of defendant's exposing his genitals and being visibly aroused in a woman's backyard was sufficient to support conviction for indecent exposure
  • holding that defendant’s actions had the dominant purpose of an appeal to the prurient interest in sex where “[e]vidence [showed] that Copeland exposed his genitals, that he was visibly aroused, and that he was masturbating”
  • “To be obscene, conduct must violate contemporary community standards of sexual candor.” (citing House v. Commonwealth, 169 S.E.2d 572, 576 (Va. 1969))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Willis, Annunziata

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.