Cope v. Cope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the paramount question in any custody suit, including a change of custody suit, is how will the best interests of the child be served
• holding the paramount question in any custody suit, including a change of custody suit, is how will the best interests of the child be served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roberts v. Roberts
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-02-10· cited 51×
• Shumway v. Shumway
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1984-03-29· cited 32×
• Levin v. Levin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 30×
• Moye v. Moye
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-04-28· cited 28×
• Hawkins v. Hawkins
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 26×
• Brownson v. Allen
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2000-03-02· cited 24×
• Monica Garner v. Christopher Garner
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-07-22· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Poesy v. Bunney
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1977-03-17· cited 56×
• Tomlinson v. Tomlinson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-05-22· cited 36×
• Embree v. Embree
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1963-03-29· cited 35×
• Nielsen v. Nielsen
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1964-08-03· cited 29×
• Strain v. Strain
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 26×
• Flynn v. Allison
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-05-12· cited 19×
• Adams v. Adams
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-07-03· cited 18×
• Bryant v. Bryant
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1968-02-08· cited 15×
• Dykstra v. Dykstra
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 14×