Cope v. Cope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where wife in marital action did not object to introduction of affidavits by her attorney which revealed confidential communications, the privilege is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1973-11-02· cited 122×
• In Re Marriage of Mulhern
  California Court of Appeal· 1973-01-15· cited 39×
• Flood v. Simpson
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-02-28· cited 25×
• Troxell v. Troxell
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-09-23· cited 19×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-03-24· cited 19×
• In Re Marriage of Brockman
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-09-16· cited 18×
• In Re Marriage of Guardino
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-06-21· cited 18×
• Carroll v. Civil Service Commission
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-09-29· cited 15×
• Stevens v. Stevens
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-12-23· cited 15×
• Waller v. Waller
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-01-13· cited 14×
• Modglin v. Modglin
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-11-14· cited 13×
• Ratkovich v. City of San Bruno
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-10-26· cited 13×
• Weingarten v. Weingarten
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-07-06· cited 11×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-03-03· cited 7×
• Nalley's Inc. v. Corona Processed Foods, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-03-21· cited 7×
• Hicks v. Hicks
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-08-13· cited 5×
• Sanchez v. Sanchez
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-05-20· cited 5×
• Resnik v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-08-21· cited 4×
• Estate of Virgl
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-06-30· cited 1×

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Primm v. Primm
  California Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 243×
• Olivera v. Grace
  California Supreme Court· 1942-02-20· cited 190×
• De la Montanya v. De la Montanya
  California Supreme Court· 1896-03-24· cited 146×
• Spellens v. Spellens
  California Supreme Court· 1957-10-30· cited 143×
• Daley v. County of Butte
  California Court of Appeal· 1964-05-22· cited 135×
• Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for Women
  California Supreme Court· 1955-11-10· cited 125×
• Pignaz v. Burnett
  California Supreme Court· 1897-12-02· cited 80×
• Damiani v. Albert
  California Supreme Court· 1957-02-15· cited 68×
• Litvinuk v. Litvinuk
  California Supreme Court· 1945-10-01· cited 61×
• Nicholson v. Henderson
  California Supreme Court· 1944-12-05· cited 57×
• Beckett v. Kaynar Manufacturing Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1958-02-14· cited 41×
• Tsarnas v. Bailey
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-03-30· cited 32×
• Buckley v. Savage
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-08-22· cited 31×
• Vartanian v. Croll
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-05-06· cited 30×
• Lissak v. Crocker Estate Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1897-12-29· cited 30×
• Falk v. Falk
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-12-29· cited 30×
• Fitzsimmons v. Jones
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-03-18· cited 27×
• Raff v. Raff
  California Supreme Court· 1964-07-07· cited 24×
• Heathman v. Vant
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-08-06· cited 22×
• Preston v. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-11-30· cited 22×