Skip to main content
· 9/18/2013

Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 112 Fed. Cl. 515
  • 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1348
  • 2013 WL 5273776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • If at any point the Court determines that it does not have jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the case
  • “A claim based on detrimental reliance is a claim based on promissory estoppel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Firestone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.