Coos Cnty. Airport Dist. v. Special Districts Ins. Servs. Trust of the Special Districts Ass'n of Or.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court of Federal Claims “cannot entertain claims brought under the Thirteenth Amendment because it does not mandate the payment of money damages for its violation.” (citing Carter v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 898, 900, 902 (1981
• analyzing reasonable foreseeability, substantial causation, reasonable certainty in amount of damages and offsets, without finding a specific acceptance rate
• denying prisoner’s IFP motion for failure to submit an adequate trust fund account statement in that the statement was not certified and did not cover the requisite six-month period
• dismissing Thirteenth Amendment claim contending plaintiff’s “vessel” was used without “renumeration”
• “This court, however, cannot entertain claims brought under the Thirteenth Amendment because it does not mandate the payment of money damages for its violation.”
• \This court ... cannot entertain claims brought under the Thirteenth Amendment because it does not mandate the payment of money damages for its violation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).