Coors v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding \an impact on at most one percent of the policyholders could not constitute public impact\ as a matter of law
• noting impact of “200 affected policy holders out of 20,000” did not constitute significant public impact
• finding no significant public impact in part due to the “challenged conduct being private in nature,” and fact that Coors was “a sophisticated businessman and was accompanied by counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).