Coors Porcelain Co. v. Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discovery of a weapon “in a place where the conspiracy was carried out or furthered” is sufficient to link the weapon to the conspiracy
• holding that the scope of remand is determined by the Court of Appeals
• \Our remand instructions ... concerned only the propriety of enhancements for weapon possession....\ (Emphasis added)
• remand instructions limited to spe- cific potential error and defendant's claim of post-sentencing rehabili- tation not relevant to that issue
• possession of weapon in a place where the conspiracy is carried on is sufficient
• sufficient proximity if gun found in place where conspiracy carried out or furthered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).