Skip to main content
· 6/18/1992

Cooperstein v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 721
  • 416 Pa. Super. 488
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that victim’s estate could not recover both liability and UIM benefits under the same policy after a single-car accident
  • reiterating prior holdings and finding that set-off language in insurance policy did not create affirmative right to recover both liability and UIM benefits from the same policy in a similar situation
  • multiple vehicle accident, but exclusion upheld to avoid conversion of UIM benefits to liability benefits because there was only one tortfeasor
  • multiple vehicle accident, but exclusion upheld to avoid conversion of UIM benefits to liability benefits because ther e was only one tortfeasor
  • estate of wife killed while riding as passenger in car operated by insured/husband could not recover underinsurance benefits after collecting benefits pursuant to liability provision of insured/husband’s multivehicle policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Olszewski, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.