Skip to main content
· 9/7/1951

Cooperative Refinery Ass'n v. Consumers Public Power Dist. Consumers Public Power Dist. v. Cooperative Refinery Ass'n

Citations

  • 190 F.2d 852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A subsequent contract completely covering the same subject-matter, and made by the same parties, as an earlier agreement, but containing terms inconsistent with the former contract, so that the two cannot stand together . . . is substituted for the earlier contract.”
  • “A subsequent contract completely covering the same subject-matter . . . but containing terms inconsistent with the former contract, so that the two cannot stand together . . . becomes the only agreement of the parties on the subject.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnsen, Riddick, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.