Skip to main content
· 3/28/1997

Cooperative Fire Insurance v. White Caps, Inc.

Citations

  • 694 A.2d 34
  • 166 Vt. 355
  • 1997 Vt. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the notice clause should not serve as a technical means for escaping liability, “but rather as an early warning mechanism to benefit both insurer and insured”
  • stating analogous proposition that “[a]n insurer cannot assert prejudice with regard to its ability to conduct an investigation that it never even tried to conduct.”
  • allowing insurer to assert breach of prompt-notice provision as affirmative coverage defense if breach caused substantial prejudice
  • addressing the purpose of policy provisions requiring notice of accident, claim, or suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.