· 3/28/1997
Cooperative Fire Insurance v. White Caps, Inc.
Citations
- 694 A.2d 34
- 166 Vt. 355
- 1997 Vt. LEXIS 32
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the notice clause should not serve as a technical means for escaping liability, “but rather as an early warning mechanism to benefit both insurer and insured”
- stating analogous proposition that “[a]n insurer cannot assert prejudice with regard to its ability to conduct an investigation that it never even tried to conduct.”
- allowing insurer to assert breach of prompt-notice provision as affirmative coverage defense if breach caused substantial prejudice
- addressing the purpose of policy provisions requiring notice of accident, claim, or suit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.