Skip to main content
· 6/6/2017

Cooper v. Starbucks Coffee Corp.

Citations

  • 164 A.3d 66
  • 2017 WL 3091741
  • 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that entire comprehensive statutory scheme should be understood, whenever possible, to give consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all its parts
  • recounting a series of legislative changes that occurred in direct response to several court decisions
  • upon revocation of probation, the court was not bound to impose the original suspended sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beckwith, McLeese, Nebeker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.