Cooper v. Saunders-Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statute’s coverage
• holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statute's coverage
• holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statute's coverage
• holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statute's coverage
• “An oral partnership agreement [for an indefinite period of time] would not run afoul of the Statute of Frauds since no term of years was ever fixed and therefore it was capable of performance within one year.”
• \An oral partnership agreement [for an indefinite period of time] would not run afoul of the Statute of Frauds since no term of years was ever fixed and therefore it was capable of performance within one year.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).