Cooper v. Neven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the cause-and-prejudice standard “dovetails exactly” with the components of a Brady claim and 21 concluding that a state timeliness bar to a petitioner’s Brady claims thus is not an “independent” state reason for dismissing a petition
• stating that 21 when a particular issue is dispositive, a district court “need not consider alternative reasons for dismissing the petition.”
• explaining that “[e]xhaustion requires the petitioner to ‘fairly present’ his claims to the highest court of the state”
• stating that when a particular issue is 2 dispositive, a district court “need not consider alternative reasons for dismissing the 3 petition.”
• stating that when a particular issue is dispositive, a district court “need not consider alternative reasons for dismissing 28 the petition.”
• stating that when a particular issue is dispositive, a district court “need not 23 consider alternative reasons for dismissing the petition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).