Cooper v. Monterey 96 St. LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “pretrial publicity that would inherently prejudice the jury pool-can be discerned only by reviewing both the extent and nature of the publicity and the responses of the prospective jurors in voir dire”
• concluding that \pretrial publicity that would inherently prejudice the jury pool can be discerned only by reviewing both the extent and nature of the publicity and the responses of the prospective jurors in voir dire\
• holding that the alleged prejudicial effect of pretrial publicity is discerned only by: 1
• concluding that \pretrial publicity that would inherently prejudice the jury pool can be discerned only by reviewing both the extent and nature of the publicity and the responses of the prospective jurors in voir dire\
• concluding that “pretrial publicity that would inherently prejudice the jury pool can be discerned only by reviewing both the extent and nature of the publicity and the responses of the prospective jurors in voir dire”
• concluding that “pretrial publicity that would inherently prejudice the jury pool can be discerned only by reviewing both the extent and nature of the publicity and the responses of the prospective jurors in voir dire”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).