· 7/21/2009
Cooper v. Meridian Yachts, Ltd.
Citations
- 575 F.3d 1151
- 2009 A.M.C. 2652
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16604
- 2009 WL 2146388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that defendants judicially admitted they lacked a principal place of business in Florida where they denied that fact in their answer to the plaintiff's complaint
- holding that a provision that covered “all disputes arising out of or in connection with” an agreement was “clearly meant to be read broadly”
- holding that contractual provision selecting Dutch law for all claims “in connection with” the agreement reaches tort claims while a provision selecting law only to govern the agreement does not
- holding that a provision that covered “all disputes 11 USCA11 Case: 20-13442 Date Filed: 03/26/2021 Page: 12 of 13 arising out of or in connection with” an agreement was “clearly meant to be read broadly”
- finding that the place of the wrongful act is not where the defect in the foodlift manifested itself, but rather where the foodlift was manufactured and installed
- stating that the phrase \arising out of or in connection with\ an agreement \is clearly meant to be read broadly\ and governs all disputes \having a connection to the agreement and not just the agreement itself\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barkett, Fay, Trager
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.