Skip to main content
· 7/21/2009

Cooper v. Meridian Yachts, Ltd.

Citations

  • 575 F.3d 1151
  • 2009 A.M.C. 2652
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16604
  • 2009 WL 2146388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that defendants judicially admitted they lacked a principal place of business in Florida where they denied that fact in their answer to the plaintiff's complaint
  • holding that a provision that covered “all disputes arising out of or in connection with” an agreement was “clearly meant to be read broadly”
  • holding that contractual provision selecting Dutch law for all claims “in connection with” the agreement reaches tort claims while a provision selecting law only to govern the agreement does not
  • holding that a provision that covered “all disputes 11 USCA11 Case: 20-13442 Date Filed: 03/26/2021 Page: 12 of 13 arising out of or in connection with” an agreement was “clearly meant to be read broadly”
  • finding that the place of the wrongful act is not where the defect in the foodlift manifested itself, but rather where the foodlift was manufactured and installed
  • stating that the phrase \arising out of or in connection with\ an agreement \is clearly meant to be read broadly\ and governs all disputes \having a connection to the agreement and not just the agreement itself\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barkett, Fay, Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.