Cooper v. Lottery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an ALJ’s failure to consider the relevant regulatory criteria in weighing medical opinions warranted remand
• explaining that a decision premised on an “incorrect interpretation of the medical evidence” is “not supported by substantial evidence”
• explaining that a decision premised on an “incorrect interpretation of the medical evidence” is “not supported by substantial evidence”
• indicating that a decision based on an incorrect interpretation of the medical evidence is not supported by substantial evidence
• explaining that a decision premised on an “incorrect interpretation of the medical evidence” is “not supported by substantial evidence”
• explaining that district courts may award benefits only if “the relevant factual issues have been resolved and the record requires a finding of disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).