Cooper v. Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the look-through 17 approach in Vaden also applies to Sections 9, 10 and 11
• relying on Doscher and holding that courts should adopt the look-through approach when determining subject matter jurisdiction under § 9 of the FAA
• applying the FAA when claimants failed to demonstrate that the parties had explicitly contemplated enforcement under the PRAA
• applying the FAA when “[c]laimants have not pointed to any language in their arbitration agreement indicating that the parties intended that state law would govern vacatur of the arbitration award”
• “[W]here the [Federal Arbitration Act] applies, it may be displaced by state law (if at all) only if the parties have so agreed explicitly.”
• “[F]ederal question jurisdiction over controversies involving arbitration cannot be based on the fact that the FAA establishes the relevant substantive law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).