· 7/11/2002
Cooper v. Illinois State University
Citations
- 772 N.E.2d 396
- 331 Ill. App. 3d 1094
- 265 Ill. Dec. 358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing plaintiffs ADEA and Title VII claims: “We adhere to Faulkner-King and Cahoon, and thus hold that in Illinois, the Act is the exclusive source of a remedy for employment-discrimination claims....”
- dismissing plaintiff’s ADEA and Title VII claims: “We adhere to Faulkner-King and Cahoon, and thus hold that in Illinois, the Act is the exclusive source of a remedy for employment-discrimination claims. . . .”
- this court not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
- this court is not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
- this court is not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
- this court not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steigmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.