Skip to main content
· 7/11/2002

Cooper v. Illinois State University

Citations

  • 772 N.E.2d 396
  • 331 Ill. App. 3d 1094
  • 265 Ill. Dec. 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiffs ADEA and Title VII claims: “We adhere to Faulkner-King and Cahoon, and thus hold that in Illinois, the Act is the exclusive source of a remedy for employment-discrimination claims....”
  • dismissing plaintiff’s ADEA and Title VII claims: “We adhere to Faulkner-King and Cahoon, and thus hold that in Illinois, the Act is the exclusive source of a remedy for employment-discrimination claims. . . .”
  • this court not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
  • this court is not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
  • this court is not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court
  • this court not bound to follow decisions of federal courts other than the United States Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.