Cooper v. Gordon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding lower court had inherent power to restore defendant to status quo ante for wrongly paid fine, restitution, and probation costs
• holding lower court had inherent power to restore defendant to status quo ante for wrongly paid fine, restitution, and probation costs
• finding that the district court had jurisdiction to entertain the defendant’s motion for a refund of the fines, costs, and restitution that he paid before his conviction was reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2015-12-21· cited 19×
• People v. Nelson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 9×
• People v. Madden
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 6×
• People v. Noel
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-12-01· cited 4×
• State v. Walker
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1994-12-20· cited 3×
• Matamoros v. Infinity Auto Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-14· cited 2×
• People v. Billups-Dryer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-09-30· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cooper v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-21· cited 19×
• Estevez v. Gordon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-22· cited 14×
• Cooper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-28· cited 7×
• Cooper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-02-04· cited 1×