Skip to main content
· 11/17/2004

Cooper v. Ford & Sinclair, PA

Citations

  • 888 So. 2d 683
  • 2004 WL 2600505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that contingency fee was earned when settlement was reached
  • “[T]he case law demonstrates that if an attorney is discharged after the contingency has already occurred, the attorney can rely on the contingency agreement for his fee.”
  • “The contingency requirement had been met and the attorneys were entitled to rely upon the provisions of the written contingency fee contract to determine the amount of their fee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.