Cooper v. County of Rensselaer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where the claimant’s attorney used “data that was roughly seven years old at the time” to calculate the job- number estimates, “there [were] obvious reasons to question [the] methodology”
• listing at least four issues with the counter evidence, only one of which related to the data creator’s expertise
• requiring an ALJ to identify and obtain reasonable explanation 13 for any conflicts between VE testimony and the DOT before relying on the VE testimony
• discussing application of “significant probative evidence standard” to various contexts when ALJ’s ignore evidence
• “To engage in meaningful review of a disability claim, an ALJ may not ignore 25 significant probative evidence that bears on the disability analysis.”
• “To engage in 24 meaningful review of a disability claim, an ALJ may not ignore significant probative evidence that 25 bears on the disability analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).