Cooper v. Cooper
Citations
- 83 Wash. 85
- 145 P. 66
- 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1587
Syllabus
<p>Judgment — Vacation—“Proceedings”—Trial—Change of Venue —Bias of Judge. Under Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 467, 468, providing that proceedings to vacate or modify a judgment for fraud in obtaining it shall he by verified petition, with process, pleadings and issues made up in the same way as in an original action, an application to modify a judgment is a new and independent proceeding within the purview of 3 Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 209-1, 209-2, providing for a change of judges for bias in any action or “proceeding.”</p> <p>Venue- — Change—Bias of Judge — Time for Application. A motion for a change of judges on account of bias of the judge is timely, where it was made as soon as the cause had been assigned under the rules of court by the presiding judge to a judge of a particular department for trial, although it had been previously assigned for trial on a day certain without designating any department or judge.</p> <p>Divorce — Decree—Modification — Jurisdiction. In divorce, the jurisdiction is continuing, especially where the interests of children are concerned, and the decree may he modified without the necessity for new process.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting trial courts may exercise equitable powers, apart from statutory proceedings, in modifying custody of children and citing numerous cases in support thereof
- noting trial courts may exercise equitable powers, apart from statutory proceedings, in modifying custody of children and citing numerous cases in support thereof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 146×
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court· 2005-11-03· cited 128×
- Clampitt v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-03· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Foster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1917-04-13· cited 11×
- Anderson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court· 1917-07-05· cited 9×
- In the Matter of Marriage of LemonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-11-05· cited 7×
- Meeker v. MeekerWashington Supreme Court· 1921-10-31· cited 3×
- State v. RochaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17· cited 1×
- State of Washington v. Michael Joe RochaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dyer v. DyerWashington Supreme Court· 1911-11-04· cited 40×
- Beers v. BeersWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-26· cited 38×
- Poland v. PolandWashington Supreme Court· 1911-06-22· cited 35×
- Harris v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court· 1912-12-14· cited 27×
- Irving v. IrvingWashington Supreme Court· 1901-09-13· cited 20×
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1914-01-31· cited 17×
- Roberts v. Shelton Southwestern RailroadWashington Supreme Court· 1899-09-02· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Jones v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-28· cited 14×
- Koontz v. KoontzWashington Supreme Court· 1901-06-25· cited 13×
- Kane v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1905-09-13· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Stevens v. Superior Court for King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-01· cited 4×
- Carr v. RemeleWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.