Cooper v. Centar Investments (Asia) Ltd. (In Re Trigem America Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an illegal swap was “outside of the protection of the statute because it was not the same or similar to anything commonly used in the securities trade”
• acknowledging a “‘transfer of an interest of the debtor in property’ is equally a statutory requirement of an action under § 548(a)(1) as it is for preferences”
• applying earmarking doctrine to § 548(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).