Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Farese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact that a non-disparagement clause could conceivably be used to hide illegality did not render it void as illegal or contrary to public policy
• holding that the mere, fact that a non-disparagement clause could conceivably be used to hide, illegality did not render it void as illegal or contrary - to public policy
• finding a non-disparagement clause in an employee’s separation agreement was not invalid because of the “mere possibility that an employer could use a non-disparagement clause to hide illegal activity”
• “The mere possibility that an employer could use a non-disparagement clause to hide illegal activity is ... insufficient to void the clause on grounds of public policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).