Skip to main content
· 8/19/2008

Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas

Citations

  • 536 F.3d 1330
  • 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1705
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19294
  • 2008 WL 3842893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the USPTO’s interpretation of “original application” was not subject to the formal notice-and-comment requirements of § 553 be- cause it “merely clarifie[d]” existing law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Chief Judge, Lourie and Linn, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.