Cooper & Cooper, Inc. v. Cameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, “unlike a dismissal without prejudice, a dismissal with prejudice operates as a rejection of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits”
• “[D]ismissal with prejudice operates as a rejection of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits and res judicata precludes further litigation.”
• standard of review; dismissal with prejudice operates as rejection of plaintiff’s claims on merits
• “Under the law of the case doctrine, a district court must follow our mandate, and we retain the authority to decide whether the district court scrupulously and fully carried out our mandate’s terms.”
• “When a plaintiff requests dismissal without prejudice and the district court intends to dismiss with prejudice, ... the district court must give the plaintiff notice of its intention and a chance to withdraw the request and proceed with litigation.”
• dismissal with prejudice operates as rejection of plaintiff’s claims on merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).