Skip to main content
· 12/9/1963

Coons v. Lawler

Citations

  • 237 Ark. 350
  • 372 S.W.2d 826
  • 1963 Ark. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[w]ithout the arbitration hearing transcript, and in the absence of detailed findings of fact in the arbitration award, we have no means of discerning the basis for the arbitrator’s decision”
  • because there was no transcript of arbitration hearing or detailed findings of fact, appellate court could not find that arbitrator’s award was unlawful and therefore could not conclude that superior court erred in declining to vacate award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFaddin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.