Coons v. Kendall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a ruling that 10 determined whether and in what amount a party faced financial liability “would require reversal” if incorrect
• certifying an order where there was “a complete absence of any precedent from any jurisdiction” on the controlling question of law
• a ruling on “the proper interpretation” of a statute “would require reversal” if incorrect
• “[T]he relevant inquiry is whether reversal would 14 hasten or at least simplify the litigation in some material way, such as by significantly narrowing the issues, conserving judicial resources, or saving the parties from needless expense.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).