Coons-Andersen v. Andersen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[ojccasional visitation with or possession of a child ... is not ‘actual care, control, and possession’ under the statute”
• holding that occasional visitation or possession of a child is not actual care, control, and possession
• “The purpose of section 102.003(a)(9) is to create standing for those who have developed and maintained a relationship with a child over time.”
• “The common law relationship is temporary and ends when the child is no longer under the care of the person in loco parentis. . . . [W]e reject the notion that [appellee’s] possible status as a person in loco parentis continued past the time the child moved out of her house.”
• \The common law relationship is temporary and ends when the child is no longer under the care of the person in loco parentis . . . . [W]e reject the notion that [appellee's] possible status as a person in loco parentis continued past the time the child moved out of her house.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).