Skip to main content

Coomer v. State

Citations

  • 575 N.E.2d 683
  • 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1278
  • 1991 WL 147045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that protected persons statute was inapplicable where child’s prior testimony was admissible under exception to the hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchanan, Robertson, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.