Cooling Systems and Flexibles, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff v. Stuart Radiator, Inc., Stuart-Western, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding district court’s errors were harmless in affirming then-Rule 41(b) judgment
• “the fewer the methods of expressing an idea, the more the allegedly infringing work must resemble the copyrighted work in order to establish substantial similarity”
• “Absent fraud, a misstatement or clerical error in the registration application . . . will not invalidate the copyright . . . .”
• “Copyright law never protects the ... ideas contained in published works.”
• “Copyright law never protects ... ideas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).