Coolik v. Hawk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the court may allow additional time where the failure to respond [to a request for admission] is (a) due to excusable neglect, and (b) is not prejudicial to the party requesting admissions”
• the purpose of rules of law is to promote justice rather than to reward technical proficiency, and this Court will not interfere with a trial court’s discretion in ruling on a motion absent abuse of such discretion
• the purpose of rules of law is to promote justice rather than to reward technical proficiency, and this Court will not interfere with a trial court's discretion in ruling on a motion absent abuse of such discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).