Skip to main content
· 10/16/2007

Coolidge v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis

Citations

  • 505 F.3d 731
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 24193
  • 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,979
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1425
  • 2007 WL 2991020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that “brief and not particularly severe” exposure to pornography depicting necrophilia did not create a hostile work environment at a crime lab
  • explaining that two reprimands followed by termination constituted an employment action
  • explaining that two reprimands followed by termi- nation constitute an adverse employment action
  • holding reprimands accompanied by tangible job consequence amount to adverse employment actions
  • incident where employee briefly viewed pornography was “not particularly severe” under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.