· 10/16/2007
Coolidge v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis
Citations
- 505 F.3d 731
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 24193
- 90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,979
- 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1425
- 2007 WL 2991020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that “brief and not particularly severe” exposure to pornography depicting necrophilia did not create a hostile work environment at a crime lab
- explaining that two reprimands followed by termination constituted an employment action
- explaining that two reprimands followed by termi- nation constitute an adverse employment action
- holding reprimands accompanied by tangible job consequence amount to adverse employment actions
- incident where employee briefly viewed pornography was “not particularly severe” under Title VII
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Flaum, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.