Cooley v. Lincoln Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that “the Supreme Court has stated clearly that: (1) due process review of punitive damages awards is a fact-specific, case-by-case inquiry—there are no rigid benchmarks that a punitive damages award may not surpass” (quotations omitted)
• finding that immediately ruling on costs preserved judicial resources
• permitting copying costs for demonstrative exhibits, exhibits, and exhibit binders for use at trial
• “Rule 54(d)(1) creates a presumption in favor of awarding costs to the prevailing party ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).