Skip to main content
· 4/8/1980

Cooley v. Department of Employment Security

Citations

  • 414 A.2d 1154
  • 138 Vt. 211
  • 1980 Vt. LEXIS 1201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that tardiness was not substantial disregard of employer’s interest, especially when policy on warnings not followed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, C. J., Daley, Billings and Hill, Jj., and Underwood, Superior Judge, Specially Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.