Cooks v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claimant's challenge to his supervisor to fire him during heated exchange was a result of poor judgment rather than misconduct
• stating that \misbehavior serious enough to warrant an employee's dismissal is not necessarily serious enough to sustain forfeiture of compensation benefits\
• finding that “isolated infractions of company policy with no prior warnings usually amount to no more than poor judgment rather than misconduct within the meaning of chapter 443”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).