Ninth Circuit· 11/2/1981
Cooks v. Spalding
Citations
- 660 F.2d 738
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 16424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that petitioner’s claim of prejudice amounted to “mere speculation”
- “Violations of state 17 law, without more, do not deprive a defendant of due process.”
- denying relief because petitioner’s claim of prejudice was speculative
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanNinth Circuit· 2014-05-16· cited 264×
- Blufford Hayes, Jr. v. Jeanne WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2002-08-26· cited 60×
- Hernandez v. MartelC.D. California· 2011-08-16· cited 8×
- United States v. JeromeD. Nevada· 1996-06-12· cited 2×
- Noguera v. DavisC.D. California· 2017-11-17· cited 2×
- Bone v. MahoneyNinth Circuit· 2003-03-25· cited 2×
- Manzano v. KramerNinth Circuit· 2002-05-03
- Hartman v. Miller-StoutNinth Circuit· 2002-12-04
- Enriquez v. PlilerNinth Circuit· 2005-07-27
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 316×
- Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisNinth Circuit· 1978-12-01· cited 276×
- Forrest Gustave v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1980-07-15· cited 80×
- Gary L. Quigg v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of the Montana State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1980-04-07· cited 74×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Clinton Burnett v. People of the State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1980-04-22· cited 74×
- Cooks v. SpaldingNinth Circuit· 1981-11-02· cited 28×
- Maxine J. La Brasca v. John Misterly, Sheriff, Sacramento CountyNinth Circuit· 1970-02-24· cited 16×
- State v. AllmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-01-27· cited 8×
- Quigg v. CristD. Montana· 1978-12-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.