Cooke v. Delaware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 42 C.F.R. §§ 2.63 and 2.64 should be read together
• recognizing that party must establish prejudice from alleged errors to warrant reversal
• stating that “erroneous admission of evidence is grounds for reversal only if a substantial right of the party is affected”
• explaining that erroneous admission of evidence is grounds for reversal only if it resulted in prejudice
• noting that reversal is required only where error results in prejudice
• noting that reversal is required only where error results in prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).